The State of MSP Capital in the Age of AI (Vendor Edition)

Forward

The managed services provider (MSP) industry has always represented more than technology. For decades, MSPs have embodied trust, operational resilience, and the quiet innovation that sustains the global small and medium-sized business (SMB) economy. They are the essential link between advanced IT solutions and the environments where businesses operate, compete, and grow.

For vendors selling into and supporting managed services, MSPs are customers. They consume vendor technologies to build the stacks behind their service offerings and act as an extension of vendor delivery and a source of predictable recurring revenue.

Today, the MSP ecosystem stands at a defining moment. Capital markets are reshaping how innovation reaches the channel, and artificial intelligence is transforming how services are delivered and valued. This marks the emergence of managed intelligence — a model that blends automation, data, governance, and human expertise to deliver measurable outcomes.

For IT vendors, the implications are significant. MSPs are no longer peripheral partners; they are the strategic interface between technology and customer productivity. As AI and automation influence pricing, labor, and service design, vendors must enable MSPs to operate more efficiently, differentiate competitively, and monetize intelligence rather than labor alone.

This report draws on a year of analysis and collaboration with leaders in MSP investment, software, and operations. It examines how market forces, capital efficiency, and AI adoption are reshaping partner requirements — and what vendors must do to align products, programs, and incentives with the economics of managed intelligence.

Top Down’s mission remains consistent: to bridge the gap between technological capability and market execution, helping software providers and MSPs build enduring, profitable partnerships grounded in shared value creation.

We hope this report offers clarity and helps vendors recognize what we see — an MSP industry still early in its evolution, with considerable opportunity ahead for those who invest in it.

Joel Abramson Managing Partner
Mark Scott General Partner
Top Down Ventures

MSPs Evolving Strategic Value

MSPs have become central to technology distribution and adoption, not only because of their reach but because their economic influence is accelerating.

The global MSP segment generates an estimated $595 billion in annual revenue and is on track to approach $950 billion by the end of the decade – a 9.2% CAGR. That scale reflects more than demand for outsourced IT. It demonstrates the expanding dependency of small and midmarket businesses on managed services for security, compliance, collaboration, and, increasingly, artificial and business intelligence.

This evolution increases their value as a go-to-market conduit. SMBs rarely employ data scientists or AI architects, and direct vendor motions often struggle to provide context, integration, and governance at scale. MSPs solve that gap by bundling technology with service-level accountability. They reduce adoption friction and amplify distribution efficiency, enabling a single partner to deploy new capabilities across dozens or hundreds of clients with minimal incremental cost.

For vendors, these dynamics demand a strategic shift. Traditional seat-based licensing and transactional partner programs are misaligned with the economics of automation. Vendors that design capabilities and pricing around efficiency, outcome delivery, and shared value creation will unlock greater partner engagement, higher retention, and stronger recurring margins as intelligence becomes a core managed service.

Understanding the Current MSP Landscape

The managed services sector has developed into one of the most stable and resilient segments of the technology economy. According to Channelnomics, well-run and mature MSPs can consistently post operating margins (EBITDA) exceeding 30%. The underlying model’s durability is anchored in recurring revenue; most established providers maintain gross retention rates above 90%, reflecting long-term customer relationships, contractual lock-in, and the difficulty most SMBs face in transitioning away from embedded service providers.

The MSP profile model provides predictable cash flow, cushions providers through economic cycles, and positions MSPs as reliable partners for vendors seeking sustained channel performance rather than transactional sales bursts.

Beneath this stability, however, the nature of managed services is evolving rapidly. What began as outsourced IT support matured into cloud orchestration and security management and is now advancing toward the era of the Managed Intelligence Provider (MIP), as defined by Pax8. Top Down refers to this new model of Next-gen MSP as Managed AI.

In this emerging model, MSPs shift from reactive maintenance and device oversight to delivering automation, data-driven insights, and measurable business outcomes. This broadens their strategic influence and changes expectations around how technology is deployed and evaluated.

Operational practices are adapting to support this evolution. Traditional ticket-driven support frameworks are giving way to telemetry-based operations, where real-time monitoring, analytics, and automated remediation reduce incident volume and service delays. AI-driven tools are accelerating this shift, allowing MSPs to automate routine tasks such as patching, triage, and documentation. Early implementations are producing tangible results, with some providers reporting margin improvements of roughly 400 basis points through reduced labor dependence and greater workload efficiency.

These developments carry direct implications for vendors. Partner enablement is no longer defined solely by product proficiency or technical certification. MSPs now prioritize technologies that enhance productivity, reduce cost-to-serve, and strengthen service delivery economics.

Vendors that can prove measurable efficiency gains and integrate seamlessly with automated workflows will gain a distinct advantage as MSPs increasingly evaluate solutions through the lens of intelligence, margin impact, and customer outcome delivery.

Capital Market Trends and What They Signal for Vendors

Capital markets are drawing clear distinctions in how technological companies are valued, and those distinctions are highly relevant to vendors selling into the MSP ecosystem. One of the most notable indicators is the widening valuation gap between software platforms positioned as AI beneficiaries and those built on traditional SaaS economics.

AI-aligned software firms are trading at forward multiples of 10x to 12x, while traditional SaaS models often trade at multiples of 5x. This spread reflects investor confidence that AI-driven productivity and automation generate more durable returns than incremental seat expansion.

Private equity is moving accordingly. Earlier cycles focused on consolidation created national MSP platforms, supported by billions of dollars in dedicated dry powder. Today, however, capital is being redeployed toward tools and platforms that increase automation density, improve data utilization, and strengthen governance. Funds are prioritizing assets that scale margin, not headcount.

The takeaway for vendors is unambiguous: capital markets are telegraphing a requirement for measurable efficiency and evidence generation. Solutions that help MSPs automate labor, document outcomes, and expand recurring margin will align most closely with where capital is concentrating — and will be rewarded with stronger growth, higher valuation potential, and greater channel demand.

MSPs as the Natural AI Distribution Channel

SMBs want AI — but they overwhelmingly cannot pursue it alone. According to research by Channelnomics and Pax8, 42% of SMBs globally are still in the exploratory phase of AI adoption, with uncertainty about use cases being the single most common barrier. In North America, that number rises to 58%, underscoring how early the market truly is.

Technical readiness is an even more significant constraint. Channelnomics and Pax8 report that 37% of SMBs report lacking internal expertise, and nearly 10% are actively seeking AI-skilled talent. Financial constraints compound the issue, with 27% struggling to justify the investment and 25% perceiving AI services as costly, particularly in APAC markets.

These capability gaps translate directly into demand for third-party support. Only 16% of SMBs attempt AI implementation independently; the vast majority seek external providers. More than two-thirds of North American buyers prioritize ongoing technical, maintenance, and operational support, and 68% specifically want integration services to ensure AI systems work with existing infrastructure. Training is also a top request — over 55% of SMBs cite skills enablement as essential.

This alignment positions MSPs as the logical channel for AI distribution. They already manage the foundational systems AI relies on — security, compliance, collaboration, and data — and they possess the contextual infrastructure visibility AI needs to be effective. The Channelnomics-Pax8 research highlights that SMBs want help organizing, cleansing, and governing data to make it “AI-ready.” They expect MSPs to take on roles ranging from integration and support to advisory services and compliance oversight.

SMBs are signaling a preference for AI delivered as a service rather than a product. Vendors that route AI capabilities through MSPs gain access to customers who lack internal capacity but are willing to invest — and who value ongoing support, integration, training, and security. MSP partnerships, therefore, become a primary lever for total addressable market expansion, enabling scalable deployment and long-term adoption far beyond what direct sales motions could achieve on their own.

Implications for Vendor Go-to-Market Design

The rapid evolution of managed services and the growing adoption of artificial intelligence require vendors to rethink traditional go-to-market strategies. The conventional formula — sell licenses, train partners on features, and supporting sales — is no longer sufficient. MSPs are being evaluated on their ability to deliver measurable business outcomes, reduce customer risk, and improve operational efficiency. Vendors must therefore align their product strategy, pricing, and partner programs with the economic realities of automation and the service-centric nature of the MSP business model.

Product Strategy

Vendors must prioritize capabilities that boost MSP productivity and automation. Features such as automated ticketing, compliance monitoring, incident response, and lifecycle management improve service economics by replacing repetitive labor with automation, enabling higher margins and growth.

Integration and orchestration are now as important as standalone features. MSPs operate multi-vendor stacks, and value emerges when products work seamlessly with PSA, RMM, security, marketplaces, and telemetry. Open APIs, modular architectures, and agent-based automation reduce operational friction and accelerate AI adoption.

AI-readiness is essential. Products need governance, auditability, and explainability so MSPs can meet compliance obligations and demonstrate transparent decision-making. Vendors that deliver strong logging, permissioning, and policy controls position MSPs to deploy AI confidently, especially in regulated industries where trust is critical.

Pricing & Packaging

Pricing models must evolve as automation diminishes traditional consumption-based metrics. Per-seat licensing is increasingly misaligned with automation: tools that reduce manual labor or eliminate user-based workflows inherently shrink consumption. Vendors should instead embrace usage, workflow, and outcome-based pricing. For example, pricing tied to prevention incidents, compliance evidence generated, or workflows orchestrated allows partners to justify spend based on realized value rather than theoretical capacity.

Aligning value capture with automation savings reinforces the business case for MSPs. If a product reduces ticket volume by 30% or compliance workload by 50%, a portion of that economic gain can be shared. This model improves ROI clarity and aligns incentives between vendor and partner. Hybrid pricing — combining fixed platform fees with variable usage components — gives MSPs flexibility. They can maintain predictable costs for core services while scaling advanced automation as demand increases.

Partner Enablement and Programs

Traditional enablement, focused on features and certifications, must shift toward competencies that drive outcomes. MSPs need training in data utilization, automation configuration, reporting, and governance. They must know how to operationalize tools — not just deploy them. Vendors that provide telemetry dashboards, benchmarking, and outcome analytics empower partners to quantify improvements and communicate value to customers.

Incentive structures also require modernization. Rebates based solely on resell volume do not account for the value of automation, efficiency, and customer retention. Vendors should reward behaviors that improve partner profitability, such as reduced cost-to-serve, increased automation density, and verified outcome reporting. Telemetry-verified incentives — where rebates align with documented efficiency — create accountability without adding administrative burden.

The net effect is a channel where vendors and MSPs co-create value rather than merely transact. Those who realign GTM strategies around automation, integration, governance, and measurable outcomes will be best positioned to capture growth in the emerging era of managed intelligence.

Return on Channel Investment in the New MSP Economy

The traditional view of channel return — measured largely by units sold, revenue booked, and market share — is no longer sufficient in a managed services landscape defined by automation and AI. In the past, a partner’s value to a vendor could be assessed by the volume of licenses transacted and the topline revenue generated. Today, those metrics obscure the real drivers of growth and profitability. MSPs operate under a recurring-revenue model, where efficiency, margins, and cost-to-serve matter as much as new customer acquisition. Return on channel investment (ROCI) must evolve to reflect the true economic impact vendors have on their partners’ businesses.

The new ROCI framework assesses how technology improves a partner’s operating model. One of the most important drivers is automation uplift — the degree to which a vendor’s solution reduces manual labor, accelerates remediation, or increases technician capacity. AI-enabled systems that cut ticket volume or automate compliance workflows directly expand partner margin.

Telemetry and shared data insights add another dimension. Vendors that provide partners with visibility into performance trends, risk indicators, and customer usage patterns enable smarter service delivery and higher-value advisory offerings. Data-driven operations enhance customer retention and unlock opportunities for cross-sell and upsell, further improving the partner’s recurring revenue base.

Vendors should instrument partner programs to measure their influence on Net Dollar Retention, EBITDA, and not just bookings. This requires correlating training and enablement to revenue expansion, quantifying reductions in cost-to-serve, and documenting margin improvement. Vendors who can demonstrate — with evidence — how their solutions lift partner profitability, gain leverage in pricing conversations, and reduce discount pressure.

ROCI in the AI-driven MSP economy revolves around measurable productivity. Solutions that amplify partner efficiency, lower service delivery costs, and strengthen recurring margins – which ultimately impact MSP EBITDA and valuations – will command loyalty and share. Vendors who adopt this outcomes-based ROCI approach will differentiate in a crowded market, secure stronger partner alignment, and unlock enduring economic advantage.

Risks and Constraints Vendors Must Prepare For

The rise of AI-enabled managed services brings significant opportunity, but vendors must also navigate an emerging set of risks that could disrupt adoption, pricing models, and partner relationships. The most immediate constraint is the evolving regulatory landscape.

The EU AI Act, along with region-specific data privacy and cybersecurity mandates, is establishing formal expectations around governance, transparency, and auditability. AI systems that lack explainability or clear accountability mechanisms may become non-compliant in certain markets or industries.

Vendors must therefore design products with embedded controls — model logging, decision tracing, data provenance, and permission frameworks — to support MSPs operating in regulated sectors such as finance, healthcare, and public administration.

Liability will also become a central issue. In a traditional support model, responsibility for errors typically rests with the technician. In an AI-driven environment, fault attribution becomes more complex. If an autonomous workflow misclassifies an incident or generates an incorrect remediation, determining whether accountability lies with the model developer, the MSP, or the customer will require new contractual frameworks. Vendors should expect legal scrutiny and must establish clear guidelines for acceptable use, error handling, and override policies. Those who fail to do so may face significant risk as automation displaces manual intervention.

Economic constraints introduce another layer of complexity. The cost of compute and model inference — particularly for generative AI — directly affects pricing strategies. Vendors cannot rely solely on consumption-based models when inference costs fluctuate or scale unpredictably. MSPs need predictable cost structures to maintain margins in recurring revenue businesses. Vendors who do not mitigate or stabilize their compute economics risk push back on pricing or reduced partner adoption.

Many MSPs lack personnel with data science or AI operations expertise. Adoption will stall if tools require specialized skills or disruptive workflow changes. Vendors must invest in automation configuration, enablement programs, and intuitive design that minimize the learning curve and reduce dependence on scarce technical talent.

AI-driven channel growth will be constrained not only by market appetite but by regulation, liability, economics, and human capital. Vendors that proactively address these risks — rather than reacting to them — will be better positioned to scale responsibly and sustain partner trust in the next phase of managed services.

What Does It Mean if an MSP Gets Funding

External funding of MSPs highlights an important and positive force shaping the modern vendor ecosystem. Capital infusions indicate that the traditional labor-centric model is giving way to one built on automation, specialization, and intellectual property.

Investors are moving beyond the old roll-up strategies focused on account consolidation and cost cutting. Instead, they are prioritizing MSPs that can convert proprietary tools and packaged service frameworks into higher-margin offerings and more resilient revenue streams. This reflects a reassessment of MSPs not as commoditized providers, but as platforms with potential to expand into adjacent areas such as cybersecurity, compliance, and data services.

Funded MSPs often demonstrate higher operational maturity, greater sales capacity, and stronger technical competencies. Access to capital enables investment in talent, certifications, and structured go-to-market plans that are more closely aligned with vendor programs and expectations. Investor oversight also tends to introduce discipline around growth, diversification, and governance. These pressures frequently accelerate the adoption of solutions that support automation, analytics, and managed security, as MSPs seek to meet market demand and achieve targeted performance gains.

In this context, funding serves as validation for vendors that their MSPs are doing the right things, are healthy businesses, and are positioned for viability over the next 5 to 10 years. It highlights partners demonstrating adaptability and long-term viability, and signals where influence and capability are concentrated within the channel.

Vendors that understand these dynamics can better identify which MSPs are positioned to become strategic collaborators capable of driving mutual growth and customer value.

Pros and Cons of MSP Consolidation

Consolidation remains a recurring concern in the managed services market, even though its scale is frequently overstated. Channelnomics analysis shows that fewer than 1% of the MSPs population consolidate annually, while 5% to 6% exit the market through distress or voluntary closure. Statistically, an MSP is far more likely to fold than to merge.

Nevertheless, consolidation matters because it disproportionately affects the largest and most capable MSPs — the partners that drive a significant share of vendor revenue and influence. When those top-tier providers merge, the downstream impact on vendor ecosystems can be material.

Pros of MSP Consolidation for Vendors

• Greater operational maturity: Larger MSPs typically demonstrate more sophisticated security, compliance, and automation capabilities, making them ideal partners for advanced offerings.
• Stronger financial resilience: Better capitalization reduces partner risk and enables more consistent purchasing behavior.
• Higher adoption velocity: Consolidated MSPs can deploy solutions across larger customer bases, accelerating vendor penetration.
• Improved service quality: Scale supports better customer experience, retention, and lifetime value — all of which benefit vendors.
• Enhanced AI readiness: With broader talent pools and resources, larger MSPs are more capable of integrating and commercializing AI-driven services.

Cons of MSP Consolidation for Vendors

• Vendor stack rationalization: Consolidated MSPs often standardize on fewer tools, resulting in lost market share for vendors displaced during integration.
• Pricing pressure: Larger entities gain leverage, negotiating deeper discounts or more favorable terms.
• Disruption risk: Mergers can slow sales motions, reduce service capacity, and delay certifications as teams integrate.
• Reduced partner diversity: Dependence on fewer, larger MSPs heightens concentration risk and increases vulnerability to churn or stack changes.
• Longer decision cycles: Bigger MSPs typically have more formal procurement processes, slowing the adoption of new tools.

Consolidation compresses the number of large partners while amplifying their strategic importance. Vendors must prepare for both outcomes: mitigating stack rationalization risks while leveraging the capabilities and scale that consolidated MSPs bring.

What Success Looks Like for Vendors in 2030

By 2030, leading vendors will move beyond transactional channel relationships and act as strategic enablers of automated, data-driven service delivery. Success will hinge on co-creation with MSPs, building AI-driven workflows tailored to verticals, compliance, and repeatable outcomes. These workflows will automate decision-making, remediation, and governance, making vendor technology an embedded part of the MSP operating model rather than a simple resell motion.

In this future environment, incentive structures will shift meaningfully. Instead of rewards tied to license volume or quarterly bookings, partner incentives will be tied to measurable results: reduced risk exposure, successful compliance evidence generation, and automation density. Vendors that can verify those outcomes through telemetry and reporting will earn stronger partner loyalty and command premium pricing.

Co-selling motions will become increasingly data-driven. Rather than relying on anecdotal pipeline signals and manual account mapping, vendors and MSPs will leverage shared intelligence to identify cross-sell, upsell, and expansion opportunities. This data collaboration will shorten sales cycles, improve customer fit, and increase lifetime value.

Platform placement will be another hallmark of vendor success. Point solutions that operate in isolation will struggle to maintain relevance. The vendors that thrive will be those that integrate deeply into PSA, RMM, security, compliance, and marketplace ecosystems — effectively becoming part of the MSP “system of action.” Their value will stem not only from functionality but from orchestration, interoperability, and context awareness.

Successful vendors will be viewed not as suppliers of tools, but as catalysts for capital efficiency, margin expansion, and scalable automation. They will help MSPs increase EBITDA without equivalent increases in labor, improve service capacity with fewer tickets, and reduce cost-to-serve through intelligent workflows. In doing so, they will align with the core economics of managed services — positioning themselves as indispensable partners in the next decade of channel transformation.

The Mandate for Vendors

The MSP channel is undergoing a structural shift in which capital, capability, and governance are converging. Investors are prioritizing automation and measurable efficiency, MSPs are evolving toward managed intelligence models, and regulators are sharpening expectations around transparency and auditability. In this environment, vendors can no longer rely on traditional channel strategies built around volume and transactional revenue. The market is moving toward outcomes, not licenses — and vendors must adapt to remain relevant and competitive.

The mandate is clear: Product design, pricing strategy, partner programs, and return-on-channel investment frameworks must align with AI-driven service delivery. Solutions that add functionality will not be enough. Vendors must deliver capabilities that improve partner productivity, reduce labor intensity, and enhance governance. Pricing must shift away from per-seat consumption toward models that reflect value created through automation and margin expansion. Partner programs must reward evidence-based efficiency, not just resell behavior or certification counts. And ROCI must evolve to quantify the impact on EBITDA, ticket deflection, and cost-to-serve reduction.

This is not a theoretical exercise; it’s a competitive requirement. Vendors that demonstrate verifiable productivity gains will earn greater wallet share, stronger partner loyalty, and increased pricing power. Those that cannot face rationalization as MSPs consolidate tool stacks and prioritize technologies that align with their economic imperatives.

The next decade will not be rewarded for its own sake. It will reward measurable outcomes delivered efficiently and at scale. MSPs are now the most critical conduit for delivering those outcomes to small and medium-sized business customers. Vendors that recognize this shift and adapt accordingly will lead the channel into its next phase — not by volume of licenses sold, but by the value they enable through automation, intelligence, and shared operational success.

Access the full report via the button below, or download this article here.

Download Full Report

Acknowledgments

Top Down Ventures extends its thanks to the research and investment community that informed this report. Special appreciation to CIBC Capital Markets (Daniel Lee), Tidemark Capital (David Yuan), Pax8 (Scott Chaison, Nick Heddy), Canalys (Jay McBain), GTIA (Dan Wensley), and William Blair for their published analyses and collaboration through industry forums.

A very special thank you to Larry Walsh and the Channelnomics team for their editorial support and contributions.

The authors also recognize the operators and founders who shared data and experience from the front lines of the Managed AI transition. Their insights made this paper a reflection of practice as well as theory.

All interpretations and conclusions are the independent judgment of Top Down Ventures.

Sources and Methodology

1. Channelnomics MSP & AI Research (2023-2024). State of Artificial Intelligence in the Global IT Channel.
2. CIBC Capital Markets (2025). Gradient Ascent 3.0 – Navigating the AI-Driven Divergence in SaaS Capital Markets; Daniel Lee essays on AI and Software M&A.
3. Tidemark Capital (2025). The Race to Become the System of Action Parts I & II; AI Playbook.
4. Pax8 (2025). The Agentic Inflection Point.
5. Canalys (2024 – 2025). MSP Trends and Predictions 2025; Now and Next for Cybersecurity Managed Services 2024.
6. CompTIA (2024). State of the Channel 2024.
7. GTIA (2025). State of the Channel 2025 and SMB Technology & Buying Trends 2025.
8. William Blair (2020). MSP Market: Entering the Golden Age.
9. Precedence Research (2025). Managed Services Forecast 2025–2034.
10. Analysys Mason (2023 – 2024). Regional managed services benchmarks.
11. PitchBook (2024). Global PE Deal Multiples Q4 2024.
12. Stanford HAI (2025). 2025 AI Index Report.
13. SVB / PitchBook (2025) – State of Corporate Venture Capital 2025.
14. McKinsey Global Institute (2023). The Economic Potential of Generative AI.
15. PwC (2023). Global Artificial Intelligence Study: Sizing the Prize.
16. Accenture (2024). Reinventing Enterprise Operations
17. IMF (2025). World Economic Outlook.
18. Gartner (2024). Gartner’s SOAR Market Guide.
19. Frost & Sullivan (2024). Latin America Managed Security Services Market, Forecast to 2027.
20. Top Down Ventures (2025). Fund Briefings, Super-Max Cyber Framework, MSP Outliers Blog Series, and Proprietary Capital Models.

Methodological Notes

Quantitative Data drawn from public market indices, private fund disclosures, and Top Down portfolio benchmarking (2023–2025). Forecasts use a weighted CAGR model based on Canalys and Precedence Research baseline growth rates. Qualitative Insights compiled through interviews with 37 operators, 15 LPs, and 10 industry analysts across North America, EMEA, and APAC. All financial figures are presented in USD. Percentages rounded to the nearest whole number. All forecasts are subject to standard Top Down assumptions on capital cost (9% discount rate) and FX neutrality.